Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 2024 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518978

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: /aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as an alternative for the local treatment of unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aim to assess the feasibility and safety of EUS-RFA in patients with unresectable PDAC. METHODS: The following was a historic cohort compounded by locally advanced (LA) and metastatic (m) PDAC naïve patients, who underwent EUS-RFA between October 2019 to March 2022. EUS-RFA was performed with a 19-g needle electrode with a 10 mm active tip for energy delivery. Study primary endpoints were feasibility, safety, and clinical follow-up; secondary endpoints were performance status (PS), local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were selected: 15/26 LA-PDAC and 11/26 mPDAC. Technical success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events. Six months after EUS-RFA, OS was 11/26 (42.3%), with significant PS improvement (P=.03). LC was achieved, with tumor reduction from 39.5 to 26 mm (P=.04). Post-treatment hypodense necrotic area was observed at six-month follow-up in 11/11 alive cases. Metastatic disease was a significant factor for OS worsening (HR 5.021; IC 95% 1.589 - 15.87; P=.004) CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RFA of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a minimally invasive and safe technique that may have an important role as targeted therapy for local treatment of unresectable cases, as well as an alternative for poor surgical candidates. Also, RFA may play a role in downstaging cancer with potential OS increase in non-metastatic cases. Large prospective cohorts are required to evaluate this technique in clinical practice.

2.
Cir Cir ; 88(3): 297-305, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32538990

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After appendectomy due to complicated acute appendicitis (CAA), there are some alternatives as antibiotic scheme: ciprofloxacin/metronidazole; as well as monoscheme based on carbapenems: ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem. AIM: This study aims to prove the efficacy of carbapenems versus ciprofloxacin/metronidazole in CAA post-operative management in terms of preventing complications during post-operative period and decreasing hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, analytical, longitudinal, and prospective cohort study (March 2014-November 2016). Patients were classified into two groups, according to the prescribed antibiotic scheme: some carbapenems or ciprofloxacin/metronidazole. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. There was an requirement for antibiotic therapy rotation only in the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole (7/49, 14.3%; p = 0.004). Carbapenems reached a mean hospital stay of 4.45 days, in contrast with ciprofloxacin/metronidazole, 8.29 days (p = 0.020). In post-surgical follow-up, there were more cases of curative resolution in the group in the carbapenems group (35/49 vs. 15/49 p < 0.001) as well as a greater number of cases with some late infection in the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole group (1/49 vs. 10/49, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: In the post-operative management of CAA, carbapenems represent an important indication to be considered as first-line antibiotic therapy.


ANTECEDENTES: Tras la cirugía por apendicitis aguda complicada existen varias alternativas de esquema antibiótico, entre las que destacan ciprofloxacino/metronidazol, o bien monoterapia con algún carbapenémico, como ertapenem, meropenem e imipenem. OBJETIVO: Determinar la eficacia de los carbapenémicos en comparación con ciprofloxacino/metronidazol en el manejo posquirúrgico de la apendicitis aguda complicada, en términos de prevención de complicaciones durante el ­posoperatorio y de reducción de la estancia hospitalaria. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional, analítico, longitudinal, prospectivo y de cohorte, de marzo de 2014 a noviembre de 2016. Los pacientes fueron clasificados en dos grupos según el esquema antibiótico prescrito: un carbapenémico o ciprofloxacino/metronidazol. RESULTADOS: Se seleccionaron 98 pacientes. Solo hubo necesidad de rotación de antibiótico en el grupo de ciprofloxacino/metronidazol (7 de 49, 14.3%; p = 0.004). En el grupo de carbapenémico, la media de estancia hospitalaria fue de 4.45 días, y en el grupo de ciprofloxacino/metronidazol fue de 8.29 días (p = 0.020). En el seguimiento posquirúrgico hubo más casos de resolución curativa en el grupo de carbapenémico (35 de 49 vs. 15 de 49; p < 0.001), así como un mayor número de casos con alguna infección tardía en el grupo de ciprofloxacino/metronidazol (1 de 49 vs. 10 de 49; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIÓN: En el manejo posquirúrgico de la apendicitis aguda complicada, los carbapenémicos representan una importante indicación que debe considerarse como antibioticoterapia de primera línea.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Comorbidade , Quimioterapia Combinada , Equador/epidemiologia , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...